Random: June 2008 Archives
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b71c3/b71c3afbd56bfc489b124e64502e986f6001f3b3" alt="largehadroncollider.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/658e1/658e145ad193ec1682cb887c404264fa2b1e3521" alt="trumpdog.jpg"
It's one of those great long-abandoned career paths, like abacus operator, footman, or pyramid designer. A list to which we will soon be able to add oil industry executive, SUV salesman, and environmental consultant to Donald Trump (left).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85b17/85b173b6a5259c0354d34fc3ef9d5111785d8758" alt="news.jpg"
I recommend the secondary headlines too, like "Lucas confession: Yes, Han really did shoot first".
However, "Rowling: I have heaps more to write about Harry" is a vision from a horrific alternate reality I'm glad I'm not part of. Take it all away!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f01e3/f01e37ab510cd42948846a7fb842d097be1f0f42" alt="cameronbullingdon.jpg"
So the Guardian, in the spirit of equality, pored over "Dave" Cameron's hair today. Right on, brothers. Curiously, though, they claim that parting to the left makes someone look more leftwing. Che Guevara, when you pried his beret off him, went a bit to the right. And Green men are disproportionately bald, myself included: what does that say? Neither left nor right, just forward, perhaps? Who knows.
But on Dave, they missed the crucial hairstyle, i.e. the posh-boy semi-mullet as adopted at the Bullingdon (he's #2 in the pic above, click for a larger one). To me that says "I know I'm going to get an excellent Establishment job - possibly The Big One".
Note that Boris is entirely unchanged. Not just the same hair, the same everything. How has he managed to avoid either aging or growing up?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ee5/43ee5b40ac00edc065d0f1916ccd908757493fc4" alt="metafilter.png"
As for the Scotsman and Herald commenters, well, we've talked about them a lot and I'm not going to go into that well of despair again.
Besides, I didn't bring you here to depress you. I brought you here so I could make you happy and share Metafilter with you. If you have another nominee for best discussions online, let me know, and I'll explain why Metafilter is better. The material linked to is endlessly fascinating, and the discussions bring in new ideas, often very informed, often funny, and, sure, sometimes pointless. Tip - the discussions aren't easy to find at first - click the "n comments" link under a story.
Recent examples include an interesting discussion on fuel costs, an explanation of online ecology in a hacking thread, and a thread on what sounds like The Best Wine Ever, including comments from people lucky enough to have tried it.
And one of the key reasons why it works, and isn't full of comment spam? They charge a one-off $5 to join. Plus some good moderation, and real community pressure to keep the site on track.
(Honourable mention for discussion: When Saturday Comes, formerly just sport)