data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d374d/d374dd0e287af892c46e6beda39ff535e83e7efa" alt="blakewoad.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d374d/d374dd0e287af892c46e6beda39ff535e83e7efa" alt="blakewoad.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d374d/d374dd0e287af892c46e6beda39ff535e83e7efa" alt="Thumbnail image for blakewoad.jpg"
Despite the ascent of Salmond to power as the "
new king of Scotland" (and I think we can all agree that he's better than the "
last king of Scotland"), the cybernats remain full to bursting with bile and bad puns. I think everyone else has left the Scotsman and Herald discussion boards to them, now they're such polluted spaces.
Vivas, first of all, subtly suggests there's something wrong with Gordon Brown. I don't think this is one of the SNP's key messages.
Persuasive, as this fellow is, he's not in the same league as Iainbroch, who I think must work in PR. The way they use "Liebour" gets funnier and funnier, and I think if I hear it one more time I'll join the SNP. Not.
The most striking of all, though, was from someone trading as "Vote for Scotlands Future, Vote for the SNP on". Yes, it just ends like that. And is devoid of the apostrophe. But these are minor linguistic misdemeanors compared to the true evils of this comment.
This disgrace to Scotland explicitly says he would like a Scot to be denied healthcare in England, and then to die, so we could have a bloody separation from England, presumably along the lines of the end of Yugoslavia. I thought initially that this person must be an agent provocateur, but he or, I suppose, she has a bit of
a history, some mad, some not so.
I've been telling the SNP for a long while now they need to pull their cybernat forces back, because these comments are not exactly helping their cause. Perhaps I shouldn't have: it's better that people know what lurks on the fringes.